Item 1. Business
Our Mission
We are a data-first generative AI drug creation company with the mission to design differentiated antibody therapeutics. Our Integrated Drug Creation platform comprises, in part, cutting edge generative AI models aimed at designing better antibody therapeutics, including against hard-to-drug targets. Antibody therapeutics represent a growing market and significant medical opportunity, yet the biopharmaceutical industry faces challenges in bringing these potentially life-changing medicines to patients. Leveraging our synthetic biology roots, we expect our Integrated Drug Creation platform to improve upon traditional biologic drug discovery by using AI to simultaneously optimize multiple drug characteristics that may be important to development and therapeutic benefit. Through these efforts, we aim to shorten time to clinic, while increasing the probability of success. Our approach expands the possibilities in biopharmaceuticals — shifting from a paradigm of drug discovery to drug creation — with the goal of bringing best-in-class and first-in-class antibody therapeutics to the patients who need them.
The AI Drug Creation Opportunity
Traditional drug discovery and preclinical development can take 4–6 years to go from discovery to clinical development. Moreover, success rates for traditional drug discovery, as defined by successfully reaching a marketed product, are estimated at less than 5%. In all, it can take as much as 12–15 years, with costs estimated to exceed more than $1 billion to bring a drug to market.
Progress in AI has been building for decades, with increasing application in drug discovery. In May 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acknowledged that AI will undoubtedly play a critical role in drug development and recognized its potential to enhance drug development in many ways, including to help bring safe and effective drugs to patients faster. A June 2023 study estimated that AI could yield time and cost savings of at least 25–50% in drug discovery up to the preclinical stage. Some analysts point specifically to generative AI as a promising approach to creating novel drugs with improved attributes, allowing drug development to move closer to drug design, speeding up the process and creating better-targeted drugs. However, generative AI depends on massive high-quality training datasets to generate quality results. For example, GPT-4, a well-known generative AI model, was trained on data at scale readily available through public sources such as the internet. This type of dataset is more limited and not as accessible for biologics drug discovery.
Our Integrated Drug Creation Platform
For over a decade, we have used synthetic biology technologies to generate antibodies at a large scale and to validate them in wet lab testing, thereby generating high-quality large datasets that can be in turn used to train and refine our AI generative models. Specifically, we believe our lab-in-the-loop process allows us to rapidly improve AI models and accelerate the design and optimization of product candidates with potentially novel, best-in-class attributes. With the data to learn, the AI to create, and the wet lab to validate, we believe we can create billions of antibody designs and screen millions of ranked antibody sequences in weeks, allowing us to go from AI-designed to wet lab-validated product candidates in as little as six weeks. Our proprietary Integrated Drug Creation platform enables us to build a strong pipeline of both internally developed and partnered programs that can expand therapeutic possibilities.
Lab in a loop
Data to Train: We leverage a 77,000+ square feet facility and wet-lab to generate high-quality data at scale for AI model training. One component of our data generation platform is our SoluPro technology, a multiplex synthetic biology approach designed to overcome the limitations of today's high-throughput automation labs. It constructs billions of genetically-distinct cells, each containing instructions to make one version of a protein of interest, as well as a different assortment of folding and expression solutions. Our ACE assay technology then evaluates and sorts hundreds of millions of designs to collect the best hits - versions of the protein-of-interest, based on target binding, protein quality, and expression titer. Additional technologies such as affinity measurements by high-throughput Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), and enrichment/ sorting of yeast and phage displayed AI-designed libraries are also adopted. Our proprietary synthetic-biology technologies and efficient operational infrastructure generates high-quality data in a high-throughput manner to train our AI models.
AI to Create: We design product candidates using our generative AI models trained on both proprietary and public biological datasets. Our generative AI models can create epitope-specific product candidates against a therapeutic target of interest, including “hard-to-drug” targets. In addition, our AI lead optimization models enable parallel multi-parametric optimization to improve certain product candidate attributes including, but not limited to, tunable binding affinity, immunogenicity, pharmacological profile, and developability.
Wet Lab to Validate: We assess our product candidates with our wet lab's high-throughput functional validation capabilities, which are designed to prove our AI models in the lab. The quality and scale of wet lab data give us extensive training data, propelling our iterative design-build-test-learn cycle.
All together, our lab-in-the-loop capabilities can take us from AI-designed antibodies to wet lab-validated candidates in as little as six weeks.
Our Integrated Drug Creation platform enables our core competencies in three broad areas:
•Target selection and discovery: There are a variety of manners in which we identify targets for our internally developed programs and collaborations. Those targets can be partner-identified targets or Absci-identified targets. One of the methods we use to identify targets is our proprietary reverse-immunology technology. We use this technology to reconstruct prevalent immune-response molecules such as antibodies from disease tissue and identify their corresponding antigens, offering new therapeutic targets, as well as the cognate binding partners, for further potential validation and optimization.
•AI-guided antibody drug creation: Starting with an envisioned drug format and target antigen, we use generative AI models such as our proprietary de novo antibody design models to generate a library of relevant sequence variants to establish the target specificity, designed to create novel therapeutic candidates with desirable attributes related to affinity, functionality, and developability.
•AI-guided lead optimization: With multi-parametric AI lead optimization, we work to simultaneously evaluate multiple sequence variants for improved target affinity, manufacturability, and other pharmacologic characteristics for further advancement, including through preclinical and clinical development.
We believe the flexibility of our platform will enable us to address specific challenges with existing targets or create product candidates across different antibody modalities.
We believe we have the potential to unlock new and differentiated value drivers:
•Enable potential first-in-class drugs: We’ve developed our Integrated Drug Creation platform which we believe enables us to access novel and differentiated biology and to address difficult-to-drug targets.
•Enable potential best-in-class drugs: Our generative AI models, including our de novo AI and AI lead optimization models, can help develop drugs with multiple, potentially superior attributes such as increased half-life, and conditional pH-dependent binding.
•Potential for increased probability of success: Our AI models have been designed to enable multi-parameter predictions and simultaneous optimization of attributes in parallel, which we believe allows us to design product candidates with desired attributes, and potentially with the best chances for clinical success.
•Reduce time to clinic: We believe our platform has the potential to reduce the time to IND (or foreign equivalent) from a 4-6 year industry average to around two years, enabling more programs per unit time.
•Expand intellectual property space: We believe that our AI-driven drug creation strategy has the potential to generate broader IP for first-in-class antibody therapeutics and find new IP for fast-follower or best-in-class antibody therapeutics.
Our Business Model
Our business model is focused on monetizing our Integrated Drug Creation platform by generating internally developed programs that are later partnered or out-licensed following certain value inflection points (anywhere from preclinical through clinical development) or by partnering with third parties who wish to leverage our Integrated Drug Creation platform for early discovery efforts in a variety of deal structures.
Internally Developed Programs: We believe that by developing our own pipeline, we will create optionality for enhanced monetization and validation of our Integrated Drug Creation platform. With the ability to selectively choose both novel and fast-follower targets, in addition to develop potentially best-in-class attributes, we aim to take our internally developed programs to certain value inflection points before considering partnering or out-licensing opportunities.
Partnered Programs:
•Drug Creation Programs: We enter into collaborations with third parties who are seeking to leverage our platform to solve challenging problems. We work closely with our partners on single and multi-target programs to develop product candidates against targets they have selected. We aim to expand and diversify our portfolio of partnered programs through these collaborations, each of which may include up-front fees and research fees, as well as potential clinical and/or commercial milestones and royalties.
•Co-development Programs: We enter into co-development partnerships with third parties who may offer perceived synergies with our Integrated Drug Creation platform. Our co-development programs are based on a clear alignment to take these programs through to certain value inflection points before considering partnering or out-licensing opportunities. Our co-development partnerships may be directed to either single and multi-target programs and may include mutual cost-sharing and/or technology contributions. We aim to further expand and diversify our portfolio of partnered programs through these co-development partnerships. By sharing both the risks and rewards of these programs, we ensure both parties are motivated for success.
Our evolving business model is underpinned by our Integrated Drug Creation platform which supports a strategic diversification of our program portfolio through internally developed programs, partnered drug creation programs and co-development programs. This strategic diversification allows us the potential to balance our program portfolio between internally developed programs for which we have more control and may provide more significant economic returns, and partnered programs which broaden our reach into therapeutic areas where our partner has established capabilities and expertise. Thus, the cornerstone of this business model evolution lies in the diversification of risk and potential return on investment. Our business model not only secures a focused set of therapeutic areas, but also gives us greater optionality, enhancing our ability to pivot and adapt as the programs progress. We believe we will grow and diversify our portfolio of programs through our model, ultimately driving innovation and delivering value for all stakeholders.
Internally Developed Programs
Our pipeline reflects internally developed programs which highlight our differentiated capabilities in de novo antibody creation, multi-parametric lead optimization, and reverse immunology, with an initial focus on cytokine biology. As of December 31, 2024, we have identified four wholly owned, internally developed programs focusing on cytokine biology as well as several undisclosed internal pipeline programs currently in early discovery phases.
ABS-101
Our first development candidate, ABS-101 is in development as a potential treatment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). IBD is a chronic condition characterized by inflammation within the gastrointestinal tract and encompasses two main disorders: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s Disease (CD). UC primarily affects the colon and the rectum, and symptoms include bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, bowel urgency, and frequent bowel movements. CD can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus, and symptoms include abdominal pain, diarrhea, weight loss, fatigue, and complications such as strictures or fistulas. Both conditions can significantly impact patients’ quality of life in terms of physical health, emotional well-being, and the unpredictability of symptom onset.
IBD affects millions of individuals worldwide, with increasing prevalence and incidence in both developed and developing countries. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 2.4 million individuals currently have IBD, with approximately 70,000 patients newly diagnosed every year. Based on research from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America, the market for IBD therapeutics is expected to experience steady growth, driven by rising disease prevalence, increasing diagnosis rates, and evolving treatment paradigms.
We believe ABS-101 may present a significant market opportunity for the treatment of IBD. Current IBD treatments face limitations such as lack of response in some patients, diminishing effectiveness over time, and a therapeutic efficacy ceiling. ABS-101 has the potential to address these limitations by providing a novel mechanism of action through blocking TL1A-driven activation of immune responses and potentially fibrosis. Additionally, ABS-101 is being developed for potential longer dosing intervals and subcutaneous injections, which we believe may improve patient compliance and quality of life. Beyond IBD, ABS-101's therapeutic relevance may extend to a range of immune-related indications, further broadening its market potential.
ABS-101 targets the immune-regulator TL1A, and in preclinical studies has demonstrated high affinity and potency, ability to bind the monomer and trimer of TL1A, anticipated low immunogenicity, and high bioavailability in non-human primates (NHPs). In addition, CMC studies have confirmed the ability to formulate ABS-101 at a high concentration of 200 mg/mL. ABS-101 is expected to be delivered via subcutaneous administration, with an anticipated dosing interval of 8-12 weeks, or even less frequently.
We are aware of first-generation advanced clinical stage product candidates targeting TL1A, including those being developed by Merck, Roche and Sanofi. For purposes of comparing the anticipated attributes of
ABS-101 to these advanced competitive antibodies, we generated putative clinical competitor antibodies and performed a head-to-head comparison against ABS-101. In these preclinical studies, ABS-101 exhibited properties consistent with a potentially superior product profile by demonstrating equal or superior potency from multiple biophysical and cellular assays, in addition to improved developability properties. For example, in a comparative single-dose pharmacokinetic study conducted in NHPs, ABS-101 demonstrated a 2-3x extended half-life compared to clinical competitors, supporting an extended dosing interval of Q8W-Q12W.
Additionally, analysis of total soluble TL1A (sTL1A) in the serum of NHPs indicated clear target engagement, evidenced by an increase in sTL1A levels over time in a dose-dependent manner, reaching a ceiling effect. The high affinity and extended half-life of ABS-101 resulted in prolonged target engagement compared to Merck and Roche's clinical competitor molecules when administered at the same dose and route. ABS-101 achieved comparable target engagement with only one-fifth of the dose versus the competitor molecules when administered via the same route of administration. A 13-week GLP toxicology study demonstrated no treatment-related adverse findings during the in-life phase and necropsy, with a NOAEL established at 600 mg/kg i.v.
Additionally, while we endeavored to create antibodies with the same attributes as those of competitive antibodies, we cannot assure you that they are comparable to or better than those being developed by our competitors, nor can we assure you that direct comparisons of ABS-101 to those of our competitors will produce similar results.
Preclinical development of ABS-101 is ongoing in preparation for a potential regulatory filing in the first half of 2025, and an anticipated interim clinical readout in the second half of 2025.
ABS-201
Our second development candidate, ABS-201 is in development as a potential treatment for androgenic alopecia (AGA). AGA is an indication with a significant clinical unmet need and a potential patient population of approximately 80 million individuals in the United States alone. AGA is a genetically predetermined disorder that can affect over 50 percent of men and over 40% of women by age 50. It is characterized by progressive loss of terminal hair of the scalp any time after puberty, and follows a characteristic distribution in both males and females. Hair loss is most prominent in the vertex and frontotemporal regions in males. In women, the frontal hairline is typically spared with diffuse hair loss at the crown and top of the head, with loss often marked by a wider center part.
Current FDA-approved treatments for AGA are limited due to variable efficacy, lack of patient compliance, potential sexual and neurological side effects. Additionally, incremental limitations exist for women of reproductive age. We believe that an antibody therapeutic that is safe and efficacious with durable effects and convenient dosing has the potential to unlock a significant commercial market for hair-regrowth therapy.
ABS-201 targets the prolactin receptor (PRLR) and, in preclinical studies has shown high affinity and potency, favorable safety and immunogenicity, extended half-life for convenient infrequent dosing, favorable developability and manufacturability attributes, and early efficacy data in a short-term hair growth model compared to minoxidil. We believe the innovative mechanism of action of ABS-201 relies on the shift of hair follicles from the regression or catagen phase to the growth or anagen phase when PRLR is inhibited, which potentially may cause durable hair re-growth, not just a slowing of hair loss.
We evaluated the efficacy of ABS-201 in a preclinical study for short term hair growth in mice. Mice were shaved until the skin was visible, then randomized into treatment groups based on skin color and initial body weight. Hair growth scores were recorded twice weekly using a predefined scale, and ABS-201 was compared to 5% topical minoxidil. ABS-201 increased hair regrowth compared to minoxidil in a short-term hair regrowth model, achieving full hair growth after 22 days, whereas minoxidil only achieved approximately one-third hair growth in the same period.
Preclinical development of ABS-201 is ongoing in preparation for a potential regulatory filing in the first half of 2026.
Partnered programs
We have historically defined “Active Programs” as drug creation programs that are subject to ongoing technology development activities intended to determine if the program can be pursued by our partner for future clinical development, as well as any program for which our partner obtains and maintains a license to our technology to advance the program after completion of the drug creation phase. There is no assurance, however, that our partners will advance any product candidates that are currently the subject of Active Programs into further preclinical or clinical development or that our partners will elect to license our technologies upon completion of the drug creation phase in a timely manner, or at all.
As of December 31, 2024, our Active Programs were as follows:
Partner Contract Date Active Programs Therapeutic Area
Owkin December 2024 1 Undisclosed
Invetx December 2024 1 Animal health
Twist Bioscience October 2024 1 Undisclosed
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center July 2024 6 Oncology
PrecisionLife December 2023 5 Undisclosed
Almirall November 2023 2 Dermatology
AstraZeneca November 2023 1 Oncology
Undisclosed July 2023 1 Undisclosed
Undisclosed March 2023 1 Undisclosed
Merck January 2022 3 Undisclosed
Merck December 2019 1 Undisclosed
Alpha Cancer Technologies August 2019 1 Oncology
SFJ Pharmaceuticals April 2019 1 Hematology
Active Programs 25
Our Integrated Drug Creation platform is utilized in our partnerships across multiple indications and targets. We have negotiated license agreements, or expected to negotiate license agreements upon completion of certain drug creation activities, with potential downstream milestone payments and royalties for all Active Programs. We are, however, not able to make accurate predictions regarding the potential timing and size of milestone payments and royalties from these agreements given the development of any drugs created under these agreements is subject to each partner’s election. As our business strategy has evolved to have a greater focus on internally developed programs, we do not intend to provide updates in our periodic filings on our Active Programs beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.
*
Strategy
Our strategy centers on our Integrated Drug Creation platform, which comprises cutting edge generative AI models and a deep expertise in synthetic biology, wet-lab data generation experimental validation capabilities. By leveraging our data advantage, we drive a continuous learning cycle—data to train, AI to create, and wet lab to validate—that accelerates AI model innovation and thus continually improves our Integrated Drug Creation platform. With each iteration, our Integrated Drug Creation platform refines its predictive capabilities, improving design capabilities and allowing us to create better antibody therapeutics against increasingly challenging targets beyond the reach of traditional drug discovery approaches.
Our strategy is focused on generating internally developed programs and partnered programs, allowing us to advance a diverse portfolio of AI-designed antibody therapeutics that have the potential to bring potentially life-changing medicines to patients.
Building a Diverse Portfolio of Internally Developed Programs: We are actively building and expanding a portfolio of internally developed programs, each designed using our generative AI models, including our de novo AI and AI-driven lead optimization models. These programs span multiple therapeutic areas, leveraging our ability to design novel biologics against complex and hard-to-drug targets. Our AI models continuously evolve, improving with each lab-in-the-loop cycle. By integrating AI-driven design with our wet-lab validation capabilities, we are rapidly advancing multiple programs centered around AI-created product candidates. Each new program strengthens our platform’s ability to scale drug creation with speed and precision, reinforcing our position as a leader in AI-driven biologic drug creation.
We believe that our internally developed programs create optionality for enhanced monetization and validation of our Integrated Drug Creation platform. With the ability to selectively choose both novel and fast-follower targets, in addition to develop potentially best-in-class antibody therapeutics, we intend to take
our internally developed programs to certain value inflection points before considering partnering or out-licensing opportunities.
Strengthening Our Position as a Partner of Choice: We have formed partnerships with large pharmaceutical companies, large biotechnology companies, and other third parties to continually expand the breadth and depth of our partnered drug creation programs and co-development programs. We believe our ability to design antibody therapeutics against hard-to-drug targets will enable us to build a diversified portfolio of programs that may offer future streams of milestone and royalty revenue.
Continuous Investment in Our Team and Integrated Drug Creation Platform: We intend to maintain our technological differentiation through continued investment in our team and platform technologies. We expect to continue to grow and maintain an integrated team of subject matter experts in AI and drug creation, thereby bolstering our capabilities in areas such as disease biology, molecular sciences, protein engineering, computational drug design, deep learning, and AI. We expect to grow and enhance our intellectual property portfolio to protect and secure the value of our innovations. We may continue to evaluate strategic and synergistic technology acquisitions to expand and strengthen our capabilities and deepen our expertise in the aforementioned areas.
Enabling the Development of New Antibody Modalities: Our ability to design, construct and rapidly screen large numbers of molecules enables us to evaluate billions of unique protein variants and increase the probability of finding the most promising product candidate. We design and optimize new-to-nature modalities driven by our AI models. We also harness the power of nature, using synthetic biology approaches with our E. coli SoluPro strains to create complex proteins and new modalities. Unlike other biologic drug discovery methods, we evaluate the variants of these desired proteins in the fully-constructed scaffold to enable creation of biologics while optimizing for target affinity. We believe that our platform will empower us and our partners to bring new and better biologic drugs to market.
Advancing AI Drug Creation by Leveraging Our Proprietary Data and Generative AI Capabilities: Our AI models learn and improve with each new program. We are enhancing the predictive power of our AI models by training our deep learning models with our own unique multi-dimensional data sets. With enough data and iterations, we aim to achieve in silico creation of novel antibody therapeutics with desired pharmacologic attributes. Moreover, our AI models are the link that correlates business scale with speed and precision. The more data we generate, the more design campaigns we complete, the more our AI models learn and advance, all of which we believe enables us to create new and better antibody therapeutics against increasingly challenging targets.
Competition
Absci is a data-first generative AI drug creation company with the mission to to design differentiated antibody therapeutics. Our Integrated Drug Creation platform comprises, in part, cutting edge generative AI models aimed at designing better antibody therapeutics, including against hard-to-drug targets and improves upon traditional biologic drug discovery by using AI to simultaneously optimize multiple drug characteristics important to development and therapeutic benefit. The market for technologies that enable biopharmaceutical research and development, such as ours, includes multiple categories of pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries where competitors are similarly working to address certain steps in target identification, biologic drug discovery, or adjacent aspects of the broad process, including:
•in the field of AI-guided drug design and discovery, we may face competition from companies attempting to use AI to design novel biologic drugs such as Generate Biomedicines, Inc., and Xaira Therapeutics, Inc., among others. In addition, we may face competition in the future from companies currently offering adjacent technology (e.g. AI-enabled small molecule design) that may seek to develop antibody design capabilities, such as Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Relay Therapeutics, Inc., Isomorphic Labs Limited, and Schrodinger, Inc., among others. Moreover, other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies seeking to develop AI capabilities for biologic drug design may also pose competition;
•in the field of novel target identification, we may face competition from academic, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology research initiatives, as well as from private and publicly traded companies focused on novel methods for target identification, including GV20 Therapeutics, Alchemab Therapeutics, and 3T Biosciences, Inc., however, in some cases we may collaborate with such companies if synergies with our Integrated Drug Creation platform are identified;
In the broader field of antibody therapeutics, we may face competition from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are developing therapeutics that address the same disease targets and/or indications addressed by our internally developed programs, including:
•several companies with product candidates targeting TL1A in clinical development for the treatment of IBD, including Merck’s MK-7240, Roche/Roivant’s RVT-3101, Sanofi/Teva’s TEV-48574 TL1A, Spyre’s SPY002, and Xencor’s XmAb942; and
•Hope Medicine’s product candidate targeting PRLR in clinical development for the treatment of androgenic alopecia.
For a discussion of the risks we face relating to competition, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Biologic Drug Development—We face competition from entities that have made substantial investments into the rapid development of novel treatments for the therapeutic indications in which we are engaged in partnered programs and internally developed programs, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies”.
Human Capital
Our employees, who we refer to as “Unlimiters”, are essential to our ability to achieve our mission to design differentiated antibody therapeutics.
Our corporate values guide both our daily decision-making and our long-term cultural development, setting the tone for how we work together with a focus on respect for patients, diversity, and community:
•We believe in the impossible
•We are one team with one finish line
•We deliver results
•We innovate because lives depend on it
•We embrace our differences
•We do the right thing
We have integrated our values into our people processes, including performance management, the candidate selection and employee promotion processes, and recognition. Incorporating these values into our culture enables our people to translate ideas into impact as we strive to create a better, faster path to new medicines. Collectively and individually we are defying conventions and disrupting the biopharmaceutical industry with bold ideas and passionate pursuit of new possibilities.
As of December 31, 2024, we had 157 employees, of which 156 were full-time employees, many of whom have advanced post-graduate degrees.
To facilitate talent attraction and retention, we strive to make Absci an inclusive, safe, and attractive workplace with opportunities to grow, develop, and connect, supported by competitive compensation and benefits, as well as social, community, health and well-being programs.
Compensation and benefits: Our compensation philosophy is designed to establish and maintain a fair and flexible compensation program that attracts and rewards talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to support our mission, drive achievement of company and individual goals and create long-term value for our stockholders. We provide employees with competitive cash compensation, an all employee equity program, and a wide range of benefits. Our short-term incentive or cash bonus program is designed to recognize and reward achievement of company goals and individual performance. Individual performance is measured by delivery of results and impact and demonstration of our corporate values. The principal purposes of our equity plans are to attract, retain, and motivate employees, consultants and directors through the granting of stock-based compensation awards that align the interests of our employees with our stockholders. All full-time employees receive an equity grant upon hire and are eligible for annual equity grants thereafter. Our employee benefits may vary by country and generally include an employee stock purchase plan, healthcare benefits for employees and their families, life and disability insurance, unlimited vacation, parental leave, retirement contributions, referral bonuses, access to mental health resources, wellness programs, and onsite services;
Training and development: We offer a number of educational resources and development opportunities with emphasis on internal mobility and fair and equitable talent practices. Employees take advantage of live courses, leadership programs, online training, team building events, seminars, conferences, lectures, university programs, peer-to-peer and leadership-guided training, and other learning opportunities across the company. All Unlimiters are eligible for an annual monetary stipend for continuing education and career development. Additionally, we have a paid internship program that offers university or graduate students real-world experience and the chance to work with our extraordinary people, while helping Absci identify and develop the next generation of Unlimiters.
Ethics and compliance: We have adopted and regularly review the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) to aid our directors, officers and employees in making ethical and legal decisions when conducting business and performing day-to-day duties. All directors, officers and employees are required to review and sign an acknowledgment regarding the Code and to agree on an annual basis to comply with the Code. We have established a reporting hotline and web form that enables employees to anonymously report any suspected violations of the Code, and we have a strict non-retaliation policy for all claims brought forward in good faith.
Communication and employee engagement: We employ a variety of tools to facilitate open and direct communication including open forums with executives, employee surveys and engagement through company- and employee-led groups and committees. Our campuses are intentionally designed to create a space for collaboration and connection. We hold company wide meetings monthly and regularly schedule time for our colleagues to connect. We appraise and refine our employee programs through our company pulse surveys. Our annual employee engagement survey process utilizes a third-party survey tool, and we supplement this process with periodic pulse surveys to help us gauge ongoing progress and employee sentiment. The senior leadership team continues to identify key initiatives that tie directly back to employee feedback to further increase employee engagement.
Diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB): Our vision is to deliver breakthrough therapeutics that address unmet medical needs for broad and diverse patient populations. Achieving that vision isn’t possible unless we have a diverse and talented team and unless we live in a diverse and equitable world, where everyone can benefit from the potentially life-changing therapeutics we’re creating. We are committed to building a team with a variety of backgrounds, skills and perspectives. We encourage grassroots efforts by our employees. We continue to evolve and advance our DEIB efforts. We believe that inclusiveness helps drive innovation and increases our understanding of the diverse group of patients we seek to benefit.
Health, safety, well-being: We are committed to promoting the health, safety, and well-being of our employees. Our Employee Safety Committee is comprised of cross-departmental members and meets regularly to review workplace safety and adherence to safety policies. We require annual workplace safety training to reinforce workplace safety procedures that may be useful in the event of emergency situations and to assist our employees in helping to prevent workplace accidents. We have numerous employees with current first aid, CPR, and AED certifications for emergency preparedness.
Intellectual Property
We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technology, inventions, know-how and improvements that we believe are commercially important to our business by seeking, maintaining, and defending patent rights, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties, that cover our Integrated Drug Creation platform, as well as our internally developed programs. We also rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our proprietary technologies and know-how to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. We also endeavor to continue to innovate and seek in-licensing opportunities to develop, strengthen and maintain our proprietary position in the field of AI-guided drug creation. Our success will depend significantly on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for our technology, our ability to defend and enforce our intellectual property rights and our ability to operate without infringing any valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. We also protect the integrity and confidentiality of our data, know-how and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information systems.
We have a broad intellectual property estate that includes numerous patent families covering key aspects of our Integrated Drug Creation platform and internally developed programs which is intended to provide multiple layers of protection. These patent families encompass filings covering AI-guided drug design and
discovery, internally developed programs (such as composition of matter, method of use etc.), and technology relevant to our proprietary assays, cell lines and expression technology. Overall, our intellectual property estate includes 79 issued or granted patents and 159 pending patent applications worldwide, which includes ten issued U.S. patents and 24 pending regular U.S. patent applications. We also have granted patents in the EU, Australia, Japan, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Israel, Mexico and South Korea. This number does not include provisional applications we have filed. Our patents and patent applications, if issued, are expected to expire between August 2033 and December 2044, in each case without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity, or other governmental fees.
As of December 31, 2024, we owned registered trademarks for Absci, our stylized “A” mark, Bionic SoluPro, SoluPro and SoluPure in the United States, as well as nineteen trademark registrations in other jurisdictions.
In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also utilize other forms of intellectual property protection, including copyright, internal know-how and trade secrets, when such other forms are better suited to protect a particular aspect of our intellectual property position. For example, our trade secrets encompass certain algorithms associated with our AI-guided drug creation deep learning AI models, our computational antibody and target discovery technology, manufacturing protocols for our E. coli SoluPro strains, libraries of protein folding solutions and design of molecular libraries for drug discovery. We believe our proprietary rights are strengthened by our comprehensive approach to intellectual property protection. It is our policy to require our employees, consultants, advisors and other independent contractors to execute confidentiality and invention assignment agreements upon accepting employment, consulting or similar relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. We also take precautions through the use of security measures to prevent the release of our proprietary information to third parties.
Although we take steps to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, including through contractual means with our employees, consultants, advisors and other independent contractors, these agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology. As a result, we may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets and other proprietary technology. For a discussion of the risks we face relating to intellectual property, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Intellectual Property.”
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
We are integrating ESG considerations into our business strategy as we continue to grow. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) oversees and coordinates with the Board and its other committees the periodic review of corporate responsibility and ESG matters pertaining to the Company, which may include the evaluation of industry practices, investor views, reputational impact, legal standards, and overall risks and benefits of ESG initiatives, as well as public reporting on these matters.
Government Regulation
Regulations Related to the Discovery, Development, Approval and Commercialization of Biotherapeutics
Our focus is on the use of our Integrated Drug Creation platform to enable us and our partners to improve the speed and success of biologic product discovery and development efforts. As such, we are subject to a number of regulations, such as those governing our laboratory facilities as well as regulations that ordinarily apply to companies in the life sciences, biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors and industries. We believe that the long-term success of our business depends, in part, on our, and our current or future partners’ ability to successfully develop and sell products identified and created through our platform technology.
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in the European Union and other countries and jurisdictions, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, clinical development, testing, manufacturing, quality control approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and import of pharmaceutical products, including biological products such as those that we or our partners
develop. The processes for obtaining marketing approvals in the United States and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations and other regulatory authorities, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. If we or our partners fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations at any time, we or our partners may become subject to administrative or judicial sanctions or other legal consequences, including among other things, restrictions on marketing or manufacturing, withdrawal of products, product recalls, fines, warning letters, untitled letters, clinical holds on clinical studies, refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, suspension or revocation of product approvals, product seizure or detention, refusal to permit the import or export of products, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment or exclusion from federal healthcare programs, mandated modification of promotional materials, issuance of safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
We or our partners must obtain the requisite approvals from the applicable regulatory authority prior to the commencement of clinical studies or marketing of a biological product in those countries. The requirements and process governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, coverage, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. In the United States, biological products are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act, and other federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations. The process required by the FDA before biologics may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:
•completion of preclinical laboratory tests and animal studies performed in accordance with the FDA’s applicable good laboratory practices regulations (GLP);
•submission to the FDA of an application for an IND, which must become effective before clinical trials may begin;
•approval of the protocol and related documentation by an independent institutional review board (IRB), or ethics committee at each clinical site before each trial may be initiated;
•performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to the FDA’s regulations commonly referred to as good clinical practices (GCPs), and any additional requirements for the protection of human research subjects and their health information, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed biological product for its intended use;
•preparation of and submission to the FDA of a biologics license application (BLA), for marketing approval that includes sufficient evidence of establishing the safety, purity, and potency of the proposed biological product for its intended indication, including from results of nonclinical testing and clinical trials;
•satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the biological product is produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs), to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the biological product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
•potential FDA audit of the nonclinical study and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the BLA;
•review of the product candidate by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate and if applicable;
•payment of user fees for FDA review of the BLA (unless a fee waiver applies); and
•FDA review and approval of the BLA, resulting in the licensure of the biological product for commercial marketing.
We intend to selectively create our own product candidates and to advance such product candidates to certain value inflection points, anywhere from preclinical validation through clinical development to clinical proof of concept in humans trials with requisite cGMP manufacturing scale-up.
Preclinical and Clinical Development
Before testing in humans, a product candidate must undergo rigorous preclinical testing. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluations of drug chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as in vitro and animal
studies to assess safety and in some cases to establish the rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to applicable federal/national, supranational, state and local level regulations and requirements, including GLP, requirements for safety/toxicology studies. The results of the preclinical studies, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, must be submitted to the FDA as part of an IND or foreign equivalent such as a clinical trial application (CTA). An IND is a request for authorization from the FDA to administer an investigational new drug to humans. In the United States, an IND must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, raises safety concerns or questions about the proposed clinical trial. In such a case, the IND may be placed on clinical hold and the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns or questions before the clinical trial can begin. Submission of an IND therefore may or may not result in FDA authorization to begin a clinical trial.
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCPs, which include the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent for their participation in any clinical study. Clinical trials are conducted under written trial protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A separate submission to the existing IND must be made for each successive clinical trial conducted during product development and for subsequent protocol amendments. Furthermore, an independent IRB for each site proposing to conduct the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial and its informed consent form before the clinical trial begins at that site, and must monitor the study until completed. Regulatory authorities, the IRB or the sponsor may suspend a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk or that the trial is unlikely to meet its stated objectives. Some studies also include oversight by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the clinical study sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board, which provides authorization for whether or not a study may move forward at designated check points based on access to certain data from the study and may recommend halting the clinical trial if it determines that there is an unacceptable safety risk for subjects or other grounds, such as no demonstration of efficacy. There are also requirements governing the reporting of ongoing clinical studies and clinical study results to public registries.
For purposes of BLA approval, human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:
•Phase 1—The investigational product is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition. These studies are designed to test the safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism and distribution of the investigational product in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness.
•Phase 2—The investigational product is administered to a limited patient population with a specified disease or condition to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and dosing schedule and to identify possible adverse side effects and safety risks. Multiple Phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted to obtain information prior to beginning larger and more expensive Phase 3 clinical trials.
•Phase 3—The investigational product is administered to an expanded patient population to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy, potency, and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk/benefit ratio of the investigational product and to provide an adequate basis for product approval and product labeling.
In some cases, the FDA may require, or firms may voluntarily pursue, post-approval clinical trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, after initial marketing approval. These clinical trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication, particularly for long-term safety follow-up. During all phases of clinical development, regulatory agencies require extensive monitoring and auditing of all clinical activities, clinical data, and clinical trial investigators.
Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and also must develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the biological product and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP. To help reduce the risk of the introduction of adventitious agents with use of biological products, the Public Health Service Act emphasizes the importance of manufacturing control for products whose attributes cannot be precisely
defined. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the sponsor must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final biological product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the biological product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
During all phases of clinical development, regulatory agencies require extensive monitoring and auditing of all clinical activities, clinical data, and clinical study investigators. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials, among other information, must be submitted at least annually to the FDA, and written IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected suspected adverse events, findings from other studies suggesting a significant risk to humans exposed to the biologic, findings from animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk for human subjects, and any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure.
The FDA, the sponsor or the IRB may suspend a clinical study at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research patients or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical study at its institution if the clinical study is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the biological product candidate has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Additionally, if the trial is being overseen by a data safety monitoring board or committee, this group may recommend halting the clinical trial if it determines that there is an unacceptable safety risk for subjects or on other grounds, such as interim data suggesting a lack of efficacy.
Biologics License Application (BLA) Submission and Review
Assuming successful completion of all required testing in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements, the results of product development, preclinical studies and clinical trials are submitted to the FDA as part of a BLA requesting approval to market the product candidate for one or more indications. The BLA must include all relevant data available from preclinical studies and clinical trials, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive findings, together with detailed information relating to the product candidate’s chemistry, manufacturing, controls, and proposed labeling, among other things. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), as amended, each BLA must be accompanied by a significant application user fee to the FDA, unless a waiver or exemption applies, which is adjusted on an annual basis. The FDA has sixty days from the applicant’s submission of a BLA to either issue a refusal to file letter or accept the BLA for filing, indicating that it is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or decide that the data is insufficient for approval, and may require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies before it accepts the filing.
Once a BLA has been accepted for filing, the FDA’s goal is to review standard applications within ten months after it accepts the application for filing, or, if the application qualifies for priority review, six months after the FDA accepts the application for filing. In both standard and priority reviews, the review process may be significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. The FDA reviews a BLA to determine, among other things, whether a product candidate is safe, pure and potent for its intended use, and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packed or held meets standards designed to assure and preserve the product’s identity, safety, strength, quality, and purity. The FDA may convene an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, to provide clinical insight on applications which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy and to review, evaluate and recommend whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
Before approving a BLA, the FDA will conduct a pre-approval inspection of the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured to determine whether the facilities comply with cGMPs. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving a BLA, the FDA will typically audit data from clinical trials to ensure compliance with GCPs. If the FDA determines that the application, manufacturing process or manufacturing facilities are not acceptable, it will outline the deficiencies in the submission and often will request additional
testing or information. Notwithstanding the submission of any requested additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
After the FDA evaluates a BLA and conducts inspections of manufacturing facilities where the investigational product and/or its drug substance will be manufactured, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the product with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A Complete Response Letter indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete and the application will not be approved in its present form. A Complete Response Letter usually describes all of the deficiencies that the FDA has identified in the BLA, except that where the FDA determines that the data supporting the application are inadequate to support approval, the FDA may issue the Complete Response Letter without first conducting required inspections, testing submitted product lots and/or reviewing proposed labeling. In issuing the Complete Response Letter, the FDA may recommend actions that the applicant might take to place the BLA in condition for approval, including requests for additional information or clarification, which may include the potential requirement for additional clinical studies and/or other significant and time-consuming requirements related to preclinical studies and manufacturing. If a Complete Response Letter is issued, the applicant may either resubmit the BLA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, withdraw the application or request a hearing. Even if such data and information is submitted, the FDA may delay or refuse approval of a BLA if applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied, require additional testing or information and/or require post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor safety or efficacy of a product.
If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such approval will be granted for a particular indication(s) and may entail limitations on the indicated uses for which such product may be marketed. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling or may condition the approval of the BLA on other changes to the proposed labeling, development of adequate controls and specifications, or a commitment to conduct post-market testing or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the effects of approved products. The FDA may also place other conditions on approvals including the requirement of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), to assure the benefits of the product outweigh its risks. A REMS is a safety strategy to manage a known or potential serious risk associated with a product and to enable patients to have continued access to such medicines by managing their safe use, and could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA also may condition approval on, among other things, changes to proposed labeling or the development of adequate controls and specifications. Any of these limitations on approval or marketing could restrict the commercial promotion, distribution, prescription or dispensing of products. Once approved, the FDA may withdraw the product approval if compliance with pre- and post-marketing requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. The FDA may require one or more Phase 4 post-market studies and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and effectiveness after commercialization, and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-marketing studies.
Expedited Development and Review Programs
The FDA offers a number of expedited development and review programs for qualifying product candidates. The fast track program is intended to expedite or facilitate the process for reviewing new product candidates that meet certain criteria. Specifically, product candidates are eligible for fast track designation if they are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the disease or condition. Fast track designation applies to the combination of the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. A sponsor may request fast track designation of a product candidate concurrently with, or at any time after, submission of an IND, and the FDA must determine if the product candidate qualifies for such designation within 60 day of receipt of the sponsor’s request. The sponsor of a fast track product has opportunities for frequent interactions with the FDA review team during product development and, once a BLA is submitted, the product may be eligible for priority review. A fast track product may also be eligible for rolling review, where the FDA may consider for review sections of the BLA on a rolling basis before the complete application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the sections of the BLA, the FDA agrees to accept sections of the BLA and determines that the schedule is acceptable, and the sponsor pays any required user fees upon submission of the first section of the BLA.
A product candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition may also be eligible for breakthrough therapy designation to expedite its development and review. A product candidate can receive breakthrough therapy designation if it is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. A sponsor may request that a product candidate be designated as a breakthrough therapy concurrently with, or at any time after, the submission of an IND, and the FDA must determine if the product candidate qualifies for breakthrough therapy designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request. The benefits of breakthrough therapy designation includes all of the fast track program features, as well as more intensive FDA interaction and guidance beginning as early as Phase 1 and an organizational commitment to expedite the development and review of the product, including involvement of senior managers and experienced review staff in a cross-disciplinary review.
Any marketing application for a product candidate submitted to the FDA for approval, including a product candidate with a fast track designation and/or breakthrough therapy designation, may be eligible for other types of FDA programs intended to expedite the FDA review and approval process, such as priority review and accelerated approval. A product candidate is eligible for priority review if it has the potential to provide a significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a serious disease or condition compared to available therapies. For original BLAs, priority review designation means the FDA’s goal is to take action on the marketing application within six months of the 60-day filing date. The FDA will attempt to direct additional resources to the evaluation of an application for a new drug or biological product designated for priority review in an effort to facilitate the review.
Additionally, product candidates studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions may receive accelerated approval upon a determination that the product candidate generally provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies and demonstrates an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of accelerated approval, the FDA will generally require the sponsor to perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials to verify and describe the anticipated effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit. Under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), the FDA is now permitted to require, as appropriate, that such trials be underway prior to approval or within a specific time period after the date of approval for a product granted accelerated approval. Sponsors are also required to send updates to the FDA every 180 days on the status of such studies, including progress toward enrollment targets, and the FDA must promptly post this information publicly. Under FDORA, the FDA has increased authority for expedited procedures to withdraw approval of a drug or indication approved under accelerated approval if, for example, the sponsor fails to conduct such studies in a timely manner and send the necessary updates to the FDA, or if a confirmatory trial fails to verify the predicted clinical benefit of the product. In addition, for products being considered for accelerated approval, the FDA generally requires, unless otherwise informed by the agency, that all advertising and promotional materials intended for dissemination or publication within 120 days of marketing approval be submitted to the agency for review during the pre-approval review period, which could adversely impact the timing of the commercial launch of the product.
Fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review and accelerated approval do not change the standards for approval but may expedite the development or approval process. Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a biological product candidate intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or 200,000 or more individuals in the United States for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the United States a product for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States for that product. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting a BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation,
the generic identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review or approval process.
If a product candidate that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full BLA, to market the same product for the same indication for seven years from the date of such approval, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity or if the holder of the orphan exclusivity cannot assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the orphan drug to meet the needs of patients with the disease or condition for which the drug was designated. Orphan exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a different product for the same disease or condition, or the same product for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the BLA application fee.
A designated orphan drug may not receive orphan exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.
Pediatric Trials and Exclusivity
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA), a BLA or supplement to a BLA must contain data to assess the safety and efficacy of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA requires that a sponsor who is planning to submit a marketing application for a product that includes a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen or new route of administration submit an initial Pediatric Study Plan (PSP), within sixty days of an end-of-Phase 2 meeting or as may be agreed between the sponsor and FDA. The initial PSP must include an outline of the pediatric study or studies that the sponsor plans to conduct, including study objectives and design, age groups, relevant endpoints and statistical approach, or a justification for not including such detailed information, and any request for a deferral of pediatric assessments or a full or partial waiver of the requirement to provide data from pediatric studies along with supporting information. The FDA and the sponsor must reach agreement on the PSP. A sponsor can submit amendments to an agreed-upon initial PSP at any time if changes to the pediatric plan need to be considered based on data collected from nonclinical studies, early phase clinical trials, and/or other clinical development programs. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of data or full or partial waivers. Sponsors who conduct studies of their product candidate in children are eligible for pediatric exclusivity. Pediatric exclusivity, if granted, adds six months to existing exclusivity periods and patent terms. This six-month exclusivity, which attaches to the twelve-year exclusivity period for reference biologics, may be granted based on the voluntary completion of a pediatric trial in accordance with an FDA-issued “Written Request” for such a trial, provided that at the time pediatric exclusivity is granted there is not less than nine months of term remaining.
Post-Approval Requirements
Any products manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to record-keeping, reporting of adverse experiences, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, and advertising and promotion of the product. After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims or changes of the site of manufacture, are subject to prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing user fee requirements, under which the FDA assesses an annual program fee for each product identified in an approved BLA.
The FDA regulations require that products be manufactured in specific approved facilities and in accordance with cGMPs. Biological product manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMPs, which impose certain organizational, procedural and documentation requirements with respect to manufacturing and quality assurance activities. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated, and, depending on the significance of the change, may require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require
investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMPs and impose reporting requirements upon us and any third-party manufacturers that we may decide to use. BLA holders using contract manufacturers, laboratories or packagers are responsible for the selection and monitoring of qualified firms, and, in certain circumstances, qualified suppliers to these firms. These firms and, where applicable, their suppliers are subject to inspections by the FDA at any time, and the discovery of violative conditions, including failure to conform to cGMP, could result in enforcement actions that interrupt the operation of any such facilities or the ability to distribute products manufactured, processed or tested by them. Manufacturers and other parties involved in the drug supply chain for prescription drug products must also comply with product tracking and tracing requirements and for notifying the FDA of counterfeit, diverted, stolen and intentionally adulterated products or products that are otherwise unfit for distribution in the United States. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMPs and other aspects of regulatory compliance.
The FDA may withdraw approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical studies to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution restrictions or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include, among other things:
a.restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of a product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;
b.fines, warning or untitled letters or holds on post-approval clinical studies;
c.refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, or suspension or revocation of existing product approvals;
d.product seizure or detention, or refusal of the FDA to permit the import or export of products;
e.consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment or exclusion from federal healthcare programs;
f.mandated modification of promotional materials and labeling and the issuance of corrective information;
g.the issuance of safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases and other communications containing warnings or other safety information about the product; or
h.injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
The FDA closely regulates the marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of biological products. A company can make only those claims relating to safety and efficacy, purity and potency that are approved by the FDA and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. However, companies may share truthful and not misleading information that is otherwise consistent with a product’s FDA approved labeling. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in, among other things, adverse publicity, warning letters, corrective advertising and potential civil and criminal penalties. Physicians may prescribe legally available products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ from those tested by us and approved by the FDA. Such off-label uses are common across medical specialties. Physicians may believe that such off-label uses are the best treatment for many patients in varied circumstances. The FDA does not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments. The FDA does, however, restrict a manufacturer’s communications on the subject of off-label use of their products.
U.S. Patent Term Restoration
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of the FDA approval of the use of our biological product candidates, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years
from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of a BLA plus the time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application. Only one patent applicable to an approved biological product is eligible for the extension and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. In addition, a patent can only be extended once and only for a single product. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. In the future, we may intend to apply for restoration of patent term for one of our patents, if and as applicable, to add patent life beyond its current expiration date, depending on the expected length of the clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of the relevant BLA.
Biosimilars and Reference Product Exclusivity
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-approved reference biological product. This amendment to the Public Health Service Act attempts to minimize duplicative testing. Biosimilarity, which requires that there be no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency, can be shown through analytical studies, animal studies, and a clinical study or studies. Interchangeability requires that a product is biosimilar to the reference product and the product must demonstrate that it can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product in any given patient and, for products that are administered multiple times to an individual, the biologic and the reference biologic may be alternated or switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic.
Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. “First licensure” typically means the initial date the particular product at issue was licensed in the United States. This does not include a supplement for the biological product or a subsequent application by the same sponsor or manufacturer of the biological product (or licensor, predecessor in interest, or other related entity) for a change that results in a new indication, route of administration, dosing schedule, dosage form, delivery system, delivery device, or strength, unless that change is a modification to the structure of the biological product and such modification changes its safety, purity, or potency. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full BLA for the competing product containing that applicant’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of its product. The BPCIA also created certain exclusivity periods for biosimilars approved as interchangeable products.
Foreign Regulation
In order to market any product outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety, and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we would need to obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory authorities before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in foreign countries and jurisdictions. Although many of the issues discussed above with respect to the United States apply similarly in the context of the European Union, the approval process varies between countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional product testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries and jurisdictions might differ from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.
Healthcare Laws and Regulations
Biopharmaceutical companies are subject to additional healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and by authorities in the states and foreign jurisdictions in which they conduct their business. These laws and regulations may constrain our relationships with our partners. Such laws include, without limitation, state and federal anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, and transparency laws and regulations related to drug pricing and payments and other transfers of value made to physicians and other
healthcare providers. If our partners’ operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations that apply, by extension, we may be subject to penalties, including, without limitation, administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, the curtailment or restructuring of operations, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs and responsible individuals may be subject to imprisonment.
Additional Regulations
In addition to the foregoing, state and federal U.S. laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances affect our business. These and other laws govern our use, handling and disposal of various biological, chemical and radioactive substances used in, and wastes generated by, our operations. If our operations result in contamination of the environment or expose individuals to hazardous substances, we could be liable for damages and governmental fines. We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws and that continued compliance therewith will not have a material adverse effect on our business. We cannot predict, however, how changes in these laws may affect our future operations.
Healthcare Reform
Payors, whether domestic or foreign, or governmental or private, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs and those methods are not always specifically adapted for new technologies. In both the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the health care system that could impact our ability to sell our products profitably. In particular, in 2010, the ACA was enacted, which, among other things, subjected biologic products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars; addressed a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; extended the Medicaid Drug Rebate program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; subjected manufacturers to new annual fees and taxes for certain branded prescription drugs; created a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% (later increased to 70%, effective as of January 1, 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D; and provided incentives to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research. Furthermore in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was enacted, which among other things: allows for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to impose price controls for certain single-source drugs and biotherapeutics reimbursed under Medicare Part B and Part D.
Anti-Corruption Laws
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (FCPA), the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and possibly other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities, such as the UK Bribery Act 2010 and the UK Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Anti-Corruption Laws). Among other matters, such Anti-Corruption Laws prohibit corporations and individuals from directly or indirectly paying, offering to pay or authorizing the payment of money or anything of value to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate, or certain other persons, in order to obtain, retain or direct business, regulatory approvals or some other advantage in an improper manner. We can also be held liable for the acts of our third party agents under the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act 2010 and possibly other Anti-Corruption Laws. In the healthcare sector, anti-corruption risk can also arise in the context of improper interactions with doctors, key opinion leaders and other healthcare professionals who work for state-affiliated hospitals, research institutions or other organizations.
Corporate Information
We were originally formed in August 2011 as an Oregon limited liability company and later converted into a Delaware limited liability company in April 2016 under the name AbSci LLC. In October 2020, we completed a reorganization whereby we were converted from a Delaware limited liability company named AbSci LLC to a Delaware corporation under the name Absci Corporation.
Our principal executive offices are located at 18105 SE Mill Plain Boulevard, Vancouver, Washington 98683. Our telephone number is (360) 949-1041. Our website address is https://www.absci.com/. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website should not be considered to be part of this Annual Report.
You are advised to read this Annual Report in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any Current Reports on Form 8-K that we may file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers (including Absci Corporation) at its website at www.sec.gov. We make our periodic and current reports available on our internet website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
Available information
Our Annual Reports on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8‑K, proxy and information statements and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a), and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), are filed with the SEC. We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and file or furnish reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Such documents and other information filed by us with the SEC are available free of charge on our investor relations website (https://investors.absci.com/) when such reports are available on the SEC’s website.
Investors and others should note that we may announce material information to the public through filings with the SEC, on our investor relations website (https://investors.absci.com/), press releases, public conference calls, and public webcasts. We encourage our investors and others to review the information disclosed through such channels as such information could be deemed to be material information. Please note that this list may be updated from time to time.